Dru Stevenson, Professor of Law

A brief record of my participation in the April 23, 2026 ABA CLE on SB 1362 and Anti‑ERPO laws, including strategic context, subject‑matter highlights, and metadata for indexing. Overview of Professional Activity On April 23, 2026, I participated in the American Bar Association (ABA) national webinar and Continuing Legal Education (CLE) program titled " SB 1362 and the Concerning Rise of Anti-ERPO Laws ." This event addressed the critical intersection of state-level preemption statutes and federal constitutional standards regarding Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs).  Law Professor Dru Stevenson’s LinkedIn announcement for the ABA CLE event "SB 1362 and the Concerning Rise of Anti-ERPO Laws," emphasizing the strategic shift toward legal community outreach. A presentation slide from the April 23, 2026, ABA webinar, outlining the legal framework of ERPOs, preemption statutes, and a technical deep dive into Texas SB 1362. Strategic Evolution of the CLE Strategy Th...

This post provides a technical summary and metadata for the article Siding with Goliath: NRA v. Vullo ,  published in the Brooklyn Law Review , Volume 91, Issue 2 (2026). Siding with Goliath: NRA v. Vullo , Dru Stevenson, Brooklyn Law Review , Vol. 91 (2026). Read the full article (brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu in Bing) . Abstract and Research Objectives The Supreme Court's 2024 decision in NRA v. Vullo addressed whether a state regulator’s communications with private entities constituted unconstitutional coercion. This research argues that the Court’s application of First Amendment precedent was misguided due to a failure to distinguish the specific oversight responsibilities of financial sector regulators. The article provides evidence-based analysis on: Governmental Chilling Effects: Evaluating the impact of personal liability on civil servant performance. Marginal Deterrence: Applying constitutional deterrence theory to administrative oversight. Corporate Reputational Risk: An...

On April 22, 2026, I participated in a virtual discourse hosted by Jennifer Mascia of The Trace , featuring Mark Barden (Co‑Founder of Sandy Hook Promise) and filmmaker Josh Seftel . The session focused on Seftel’s documentary All the Empty Rooms and the broader sociological impact of firearm‑related trauma in the United States. It was especially valuable to hear Seftel describe how he selected this project and approached its development and production. Mark Barden’s perspective—as a parent who lost a child in a school shooting—added a level of moral clarity and lived experience that is often missing from policy debates. His discussion of Sandy Hook Promise’s most impactful initiatives underscored the importance of sustained, evidence‑informed advocacy. Narrative evidence of the kind presented in the film provides a qualitative counterweight to the quantitative data typically used in administrative rulemaking or legislative testimony on firearm policy. It also serves as a rea...

Video Overview This lecture provides an overview of the Unrelated Business Income Tax (UBIT) , specifically tailored for a Law School course on Nonprofit Incorporations . It covers the definition of unrelated trade or business, the risks to 501(c)(3) status, and common statutory exemptions. Key Concepts Covered Definition: Income from a trade or business that is regularly carried on and not substantially related to the organization's exempt purpose. Statutory Exemptions: Volunteer labor, thrift shops, and convenience-based activities (e.g., hospital gift shops). Passive Income: Treatment of dividends, royalties, and real estate rent. Compliance: Thresholds for filing IRS Form 990-T and the current corporate tax rate of 21%. Video Chapters 0:00 - Introduction to UBIT 0:27 - Defining Unrelated Business Income 2:51 - When is Income Considered Unrelated? 3:33 - IRS Factors & Red Flags 4:37 - Examples: Environmental Kits vs. Halfway Houses 7:14 - Statutory Exemptions: Volunt...

On April 20, 2026, I participated in a virtual session hosted by Texas Gun Sense featuring Dr. Brian H. Williams , a trauma surgeon and former health policy advisor to Senator Chris Murphy. The discussion centered on the clinical realities of firearm trauma and the administrative hurdles to effective policy. Here is a screenshot of what I shared on LinkedIn while I was watching it: Professor Dru Stevenson was participating in the Texas Gun Sense webinar with Dr. Brian H. Williams. Two specific areas of the discussion warrant particular attention for researchers and policy analysts, and I now turn to these topics. 1. The Disparity in Pediatric Mortality Milestones A significant portion of the presentation addressed the recent shift in national statistics. While it is widely reported that 2020 was the year firearms became the leading cause of death for all American children and adolescents, Dr. Williams highlighted a deeper chronological disparity. For Black children and teens , firearm...

I submitted a new article manuscript to about 70 law reviews on April 9, and I am still waiting anxiously for a publication offer! In the last few years, I have been submitting at the very end of the Spring submission cycle, because I think it is a less crowded field than in February or March, and the journals that still have spots to fill will actually read my manuscript. Still, the period of waiting for an offer is certainly nerve-wracking!  The manuscript analyzes the long-dormant administrative relief mechanism under 18 U.S.C. § 925(c) and offers a new framework for a Department of Justice 'discretionary restoration' program that complies with recent Supreme Court Second Amendment jurisprudence. To learn more about my scholarship, publications, and academic profile, visit my Identity Page : https://drustevenson.blogspot.com/p/about-professor-dru-stevenson-identity.html (drustevenson.blogspot.com in Bing)

Legal Analysis: NRA v. NRA Foundation (2026) Entity Overview Plaintiff: National Rifle Association of America Inc. (NRA) Defendant: NRA Foundation Inc. (The "Foundation") Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia Case Number: 1:26-cv-00015 Subject Matter: Intellectual Property, Nonprofit Governance, Breach of Contract Core Legal Issues & Claims The litigation centers on the NRA’s attempt to sever the Foundation's use of its intellectual property following an internal leadership schism . Trademark Infringement & Unfair Competition: NRA asserts it has revoked the 1990 consent allowing the Foundation to use the "NRA" mark . Ultra Vires Violations: NRA alleges the Foundation violated its own organizational documents by stripping the NRA board of its right to appoint trustees . Breach of Charitable Trust: Allegations that Foundation leaders threatened to misuse approximately $160 million in donor funds . Fiduciary Misconduct Context: T...