About Professor Dru Stevenson

By

 

Welcome. I am a tenured Professor of Law at South Texas College of Law Houston, where I have taught since 2003. I also hold the title of Vinson & Elkins Research Professor.

The purpose of this blog is to provide comprehensive, up-to-date legal education resources for law students, bar exam candidates, and practitioners seeking current analysis.

 

Professional Credentials and Expertise

My primary teaching and research areas are foundational to modern legal practice:

  • Professional Responsibility (taught every semester)
  • Administrative Law
  • Legislation & Regulation
  • Law & Economics

 

My work is frequently cited by state and federal courts, including the 3rd, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, and 9th Circuit Courts of Appeals.

 

Education

  • LL.M., Yale Law School, New Haven, CT (2002)
  • J.D., with Honors, University of Connecticut School of Law (1999)
  • B.A., Magna Cum Laude, Wheaton College (1989)

 

Publications and Academic Authority

My academic authority is grounded in extensive scholarship across several areas of law, including administrative law, legal ethics, and Second Amendment issues.

 

Key Books and Study Aids

  • The Glannon Guide for Professional Responsibility (4th ed. Wolters-Kluwer 2023)
  • Administrative Law in a Flash (Aspen Publ. 2010, 2nd ed. 2014)
  • 525 MPRE Practice Questions for 2025 (KDP/Amazon 2025)

 

Featured Articles

  • In Defense of the Felon-in-Possession Laws, 43 Cardozo L. Rev. 1573 (2022)
  • The Complex Interplay Between the Controlled Substances Act and the Gun Control Act, 18 Ohio St. J. Crim. L. 211 (2020)
  • Operation Choke Point: Myths & Reality, 75 Admin. L. Rev. 317 (2023)
  • Going Gunless, 86 Brooklyn L. Rev. 179 (2020
  • Ethical Issues with Lawyers Openly Carrying Firearms (Winner of the 2020 Claude Ducloux Prize for Excellence in Legal Ethics Scholarship)

 

Official Links

Connect with me and verify my credentials using these official sources:

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Careful With Those Lawyer Jokes....

By
Image
I kind of enjoy lawyer jokes, but the media tried to make it sound like this was a case of egregious overlawyering. Notice at the end of the article that these guys complain they've been standing outside Long Island courthouses mocking lawyers " for years " without being arrested: "The pair said that for years they have stood outside courthouses on Long Island and mocked lawyers." Duh. You didn't expect one of those evil, assertive lawyers to get sick of it and complain at some point? As a practitioner, I didn't enjoy standing in line outside the courthouse in the freezing New England weather any more than the rest of the people - actually probably less, because most people appearing on charges seemed to bring friends and family with them to keep them company. These protestors really must not have enough to do! Get a job or something! If somebody finally decided he'd had enough, how was he supposed to know these guys were there that day fo...
Read more

Special-Interest Law Schools

By
I mentioned this article earlier in passing. The link in the title leads to the relatively even-handed treatment of Jerry Falwell's new Christian law school in Legal Affairs. (The first class of students there must have completed their first set of final exams by now). I would not be interested in teaching there myself, and worry about their bar passage rate, etc., but most of the criticisms in the media have been overblown. I like special interest law schools. They form a nice complement to the rest of our institutions, the 200 or so law schools that collectively graduate nearly 40,000 new but mostly generic practitioners every year. It enriches our legal system to have a subset of lawyers whose skills are devoted to and oriented around a particular social cause, instead of whatever case walks in the door and pays the bills. (My stint as a legal aid lawyer left me biased, though). It enriches social movements and NGO's to have lawyers who do more than take occasional pro bo...
Read more

Judge Issues Landmark Church Abuse Ruling

By
A judge in Boston has held that a church (in this case, a Jehovah's Witnesses group) has a fiduciary duty to protect its members from being molested by the clergy. This appears to be a new step in the development of church liability law; whereas many of the cases against the Roman Catholic Church in recent years centered on allegations that the hierarchy knowingly allowed the abuse to continue, this rule would create almost strict liability for churches. From the article: "A Superior Court judge has ruled that a Jehovah's Witness church in Boston can be sued for breaking its trust and legal duty to a girl who claims she was sexually abused by one of the church's ministerial servants." This ruling appears to be the first time a court (at least in that state) has ruled that church officials have a "fiduciary duty" to their members. "Fiduciary duty" is a legal term of art: in practice, it means that certain people in positions of trust have a le...
Read more