Law lectures, legal analysis, and commentary by Dru Stevenson, Tenured Professor of Law at South Texas College of Law Houston. Focusing on Administrative Law, FOIA, and Professional Responsibility.
🏛️ New: The Complete Administrative Law Lecture Series is Now Public I am pleased to announce the public availability of the complete Administrative Law lecture series for the Fall 2025 semester. This series includes 46 new videos posted in the last seven months, covering the core principles of the administrative state and essential topics for the bar exam and legal practice. The videos cover the full spectrum of agency power, including rulemaking, adjudication, and the critical role of judicial review. As a Professor of Law at South Texas College of Law Houston (STCL), this is the definitive, up-to-date guide for current legal analysis. Why This Content is Essential Now (H2) The Supreme Court’s recent decisions have fundamentally reshaped the landscape of Administrative Law, making new, up-to-date analysis essential for students and practitioners alike. This series includes new videos focused on: ⚖️ Statutory Interpretation and Deference (H3) New analysis on the Chevron doc...
I posted a lengthy response to a comment I received on this, and decided to republish the post...
YES! News reports say that Bull's Eye Shooter Supply of Tacoma agreed to pay $2 million to survivors and families of victims of the notorious Washington, DC snipers (John Allen Muhammad and Lee Boyd Malvo). Gun maker Bushmaster Firearms Inc. of Windham, Maine, will pay $500,000. It apparently marks the first time a gun maker has agreed to pay such a settlement. This is real progress in the march toward having gun prices reflect their true "cost" more accurately. Up to now the social cost of murder victims was externalized onto nonusers. If the idea catches on, gun makers and shops will start insuring against the liability, and pass the cost of the premiums through to buyers; buyers will then be paying a more realistic price for the product instead of getting a susbidy from innocent bystanders. Read my comments for more explanation....
If you want to know what kept lawyers awake at night over the last six years, don't look at the headlines. Look at the Ethics Opinions. In 2020, the ABA was worried about how we work from our kitchen tables (Op. 20-495). By 2024, they were worried about whether our computers were lying to us (Op. 24-512). And just this month, with Op. 521, they’ve turned the lens back on the judges themselves—reminding us that the 'appearance of impropriety' isn't just a courtroom standard; it’s a management standard. I compiled a list of all the formal ethics opinions from the American Bar Association from 2020 onward (up to today, Feb. 24, 2026). I have hyperlinks to download the opinions free online. · ABA Formal Op. 26-521 The Judicial Canons of Ethics Applicability to the Administrative and Supervisory Role of a Judge · ABA Formal Op. 26-520 A Lawyer’s Obligation to Convey Information to a Former Client or Successor C...