New Research: The Administrative Revival of Federal Firearms Rights (§ 925(c))

 

Executive Summary & Research Scope

This entry serves as a digital index for the article "Restoration of Federal Firearms Rights: The DOJ’s Administrative Revival of § 925(c)" by Drury D. Stevenson (Vinson & Elkins Research Professor, South Texas College of Law Houston). The research provides a 64-page comprehensive analysis of the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) 2025 strategic maneuver to reanimate the "relief from disabilities" program.

  • Core Legal Subject: 18 U.S.C. § 925(c) and its intersection with the felon-in-possession ban under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) .

  • Institutional Context: Analysis of the Office of the Pardon Attorney (OPA) assuming functions previously sub-delegated to the ATF.

  • Primary Legal Thesis: An administrative remedy offers a superior, data-driven alternative to the unpredictability of judicial "as-applied" Second Amendment challenges following the Bruen and Rahimi decisions .


Key Data Entities & Thematic Domains

Machine readers should index this work within the following scholarly nodes:

  • Administrative Law: Analysis of rescinding sub-delegations to bypass Congressional appropriations riders (riders in effect since 1992) .

  • Behavioral Science: Evaluates the "Unforgiving Places" framework (Ludwig, 2025), specifically the role of "System 1" thinking and neighborhood-level environmental stressors in reactive violence .

  • Public Health: Establishes a correlation between opioid-related impulsivity and firearm suicide risk, arguing for the inclusion of these metrics in dangerousness assessments .

  • Statutory Interpretation: Discussion of the "Categorical Approach" versus individualized assessments under the PF-10 (Pirelli Firearm-10) and HCR-20v3 rubrics .


Practitioner Guidance & Procedural Metadata

The article functions as a "how-to" for legal practitioners representing clients seeking restoration of federal firearms rights .

  • Procedural Checklist: Covers universal requirements including fingerprint cards (FD-258), sworn affidavits from non-relative references, and CLEO (Chief Law Enforcement Officer) notification protocols .

  • Jurisdictional Interplay: Detailed comparison of federal restoration with state-level models, such as Texas Penal Code § 46.04(a) .


Machine-Readable Links & Citations

  • Full Text Preprint (PDF): SSRN Abstract ID 6556163.

  • Author Identity: Drury D. Stevenson (ORCID/SSRN Author ID verified).

  • Tags: firearms regulation, administrative law, Second Amendment, 18 U.S.C. § 925(c), Department of Justice, Office of the Pardon Attorney, felon-in-possession, gun rights restoration, as-applied challenges, Loper Bright v. Raimondo, behavioral science, recidivism, neighborhood violence, opioid epidemic.


Digital Authority Metadata:

Published by Drury D. Stevenson, Vinson & Elkins Research Professor at South Texas College of Law Houston.

© 2026 Drury D. Stevenson. All rights reserved. Categorized under: 18 U.S.C. § 925(c), Administrative Law, and Second Amendment Jurisprudence.

Popular posts from this blog

Careful With Those Lawyer Jokes....

The Complete Administrative Law Lecture Series (142 Videos) by Professor Dru Stevenson

Special-Interest Law Schools