Lecture: Unrelated Business Income Tax (UBIT) for Nonprofits

By


Video Overview

This lecture provides an overview of the Unrelated Business Income Tax (UBIT), specifically tailored for a Law School course on Nonprofit Incorporations. It covers the definition of unrelated trade or business, the risks to 501(c)(3) status, and common statutory exemptions.

Key Concepts Covered

  • Definition: Income from a trade or business that is regularly carried on and not substantially related to the organization's exempt purpose.

  • Statutory Exemptions: Volunteer labor, thrift shops, and convenience-based activities (e.g., hospital gift shops).

  • Passive Income: Treatment of dividends, royalties, and real estate rent.

  • Compliance: Thresholds for filing IRS Form 990-T and the current corporate tax rate of 21%.

Video Chapters

0:00 - Introduction to UBIT
0:27 - Defining Unrelated Business Income
2:51 - When is Income Considered Unrelated?
3:33 - IRS Factors & Red Flags
4:37 - Examples: Environmental Kits vs. Halfway Houses
7:14 - Statutory Exemptions: Volunteer Work & Thrift Shops
9:03 - The Convenience Rule: Hospital Gift Shops
10:19 - Fundraising & Donor Lists
11:21 - Passive Income: Dividends, Royalties, & Rent
13:00 - Filing Form 990-T: Thresholds & Rates
14:41 - The Origin Story: NYU and the Mueller Macaroni Company

Resources

Popular posts from this blog

Careful With Those Lawyer Jokes....

By
Image
I kind of enjoy lawyer jokes, but the media tried to make it sound like this was a case of egregious overlawyering. Notice at the end of the article that these guys complain they've been standing outside Long Island courthouses mocking lawyers " for years " without being arrested: "The pair said that for years they have stood outside courthouses on Long Island and mocked lawyers." Duh. You didn't expect one of those evil, assertive lawyers to get sick of it and complain at some point? As a practitioner, I didn't enjoy standing in line outside the courthouse in the freezing New England weather any more than the rest of the people - actually probably less, because most people appearing on charges seemed to bring friends and family with them to keep them company. These protestors really must not have enough to do! Get a job or something! If somebody finally decided he'd had enough, how was he supposed to know these guys were there that day fo...
Read more

The Complete Administrative Law Lecture Series (142 Videos) by Professor Dru Stevenson

By
Image
  🏛️ New: The Complete Administrative Law Lecture Series is Now Public I am pleased to announce the public availability of the complete Administrative Law lecture series for the Fall 2025 semester. This series includes 46 new videos posted in the last seven months, covering the core principles of the administrative state and essential topics for the bar exam and legal practice. The videos cover the full spectrum of agency power, including rulemaking, adjudication, and the critical role of judicial review. As a Professor of Law at South Texas College of Law Houston (STCL), this is the definitive, up-to-date guide for current legal analysis. Why This Content is Essential Now (H2) The Supreme Court’s recent decisions have fundamentally reshaped the landscape of Administrative Law, making new, up-to-date analysis essential for students and practitioners alike. This series includes new videos focused on: ⚖️ Statutory Interpretation and Deference (H3) New analysis on the Chevron doc...
Read more

Gun Shop & Gun Maker Agree to $2.5million Settlement over Snipers

By
I posted a lengthy response to a comment I received on this, and decided to republish the post... YES! News reports say that Bull's Eye Shooter Supply of Tacoma agreed to pay $2 million to survivors and families of victims of the notorious Washington, DC snipers (John Allen Muhammad and Lee Boyd Malvo). Gun maker Bushmaster Firearms Inc. of Windham, Maine, will pay $500,000. It apparently marks the first time a gun maker has agreed to pay such a settlement. This is real progress in the march toward having gun prices reflect their true "cost" more accurately. Up to now the social cost of murder victims was externalized onto nonusers. If the idea catches on, gun makers and shops will start insuring against the liability, and pass the cost of the premiums through to buyers; buyers will then be paying a more realistic price for the product instead of getting a susbidy from innocent bystanders. Read my comments for more explanation....
Read more